The view from the Monte. Behind us is the city.
Pope's castle even higher up the mountain/hill/butte.
Despite the shot, it it's located in a busy city park.
But onto more interesting things: fake relics. Wednesday morning we went to Bolsena. Bolsena is the site of the mass where the Eucharistic miracle I mentioned in Orvieto happened, and they still have the altar, which is pretty neat. However, according to their version of events, the host bled so heavily that the blood went right through the corporal and left a nice red dot on the altar stone, was removed and framed for veneration. Let me be clear, I do not doubt the initial miracle, nor the fact the altar is a genuine relic.
The altar. What is nice is that the missing corner is clearly the one in the reliquary.
What I doubt is the nice little blood spot on the stone. First and foremost, the stain doesn't match the corporal. Second, the corporal isn't that soaked, so I doubt blood would have gone through enough to soak into stone. Third, the altar doesn't appear in the contemporary literature (50-60 years later) that Orvieto had posted of the event and the bishop of Orvieto had been told to remove all the relics, and the altar isn't that big, so you think he would have absconded with the altar. I have a feeling that after Orvieto got popular, Bolsena, site of the actual miracle felt the need to play up their relic a bit to get pilgrims and so had fun with some red agents. We pilgrims want to see the miracle, not where it took place. The closest analogy I can think of is Our Lady of Guadalupe. We want to see the tilma bearing her miraculous image, and not the bishop's palace where she appeared. Of course, I could be cynical, and just to be on the safe side I did venerate because it's still an altar where there was a Eucharistic miracle.
No comments:
Post a Comment